Re: Fillfactor effectiveness on existing table
Durgamahesh Manne <maheshpostgres9@gmail.com>
From: Durgamahesh Manne <maheshpostgres9@gmail.com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-02-11T02:28:41Z
Lists: pgsql-general
On Wed, 11 Feb, 2026, 00:01 Laurenz Albe, <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote: > On Tue, 2026-02-10 at 21:25 +0530, Durgamahesh Manne wrote: > > I added fillfactor with less than 100 to existing table then ran vacuum > full to take effect > > > > How to ensure the applied fillfactor is working successfully > > > > A ratio of hot updates in catalog table should higher than value of > n_dead_tup or n_tup_upd? Or what ? > > Run > > SELECT n_tup_upd, n_tup_hot_upd > FROM pg_stat_all_tables > WHERE relname = 'your table'; > > Then wait for an hour and run the query again. > > See how much "n_tup_upd" and "n_tup_hot_upd" increased in that hour. > If the increase is about the same for both, almost all of your UPDATEs > are HOT. > > Yours, > Laurenz Albe > Hi @Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> offer=> SELECT relname AS table_name, n_tup_upd AS updates, n_tup_hot_upd AS hot_updates FROM pg_stat_all_tables WHERE relname = 'market'; table_name | updates | hot_updates market | 5997455764 | 3752865557 Regards Durga Mahesh >