Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.
Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
To: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>,
Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>,
Maxim Orlov <m.orlov@postgrespro.ru>, lubennikovaav@gmail.com, Hamid Akhtar <hamid.akhtar@percona.com>
Date: 2022-09-28T08:43:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
amcheck: Optimize speed of checking for unique constraint violation
- cdd6ab9d1f53 18.0 landed
-
amcheck: Report an error when the next page to a leaf is not a leaf
- 97e5b0026fc2 17.0 landed
-
amcheck: Don't load the right sibling page into BtreeCheckState
- 0b5c16124811 17.0 landed
-
amcheck: Refactoring the storage of the last visible entry
- 532d94fec32a 17.0 landed
-
Teach contrib/amcheck to check the unique constraint violation
- 5ae2087202af 17.0 landed
-
Add macros in hash and btree AMs to get the special area of their pages
- d16773cdc862 15.0 cited
Hi hackers, > I think, this patch was marked as "Waiting on Author", probably, by mistake. Since recent changes were done without any significant code changes and CF bot how happy again. > > I'm going to move it to RfC, could I? If not, please tell why. I restored the "Ready for Committer" state. I don't think it's a good practice to change the state every time the patch has a slight conflict or something. This is not helpful at all. Such things happen quite regularly and typically are fixed in a couple of days. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev