Re: [PATCH] Add get_bytes() and set_bytes() functions

Hi,

> On 19.08.24 16:10, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> > To clarify, supporting bytea<->integer (and/or bytea<->numeric) casts
> > doesn't strike me as a terrible idea but it doesn't address the issue
> > I'm proposing to solve.
>
> What is the issue you are proposing to solve?
>
> You linked to a couple of threads and stackoverflow pages, and you
> concluded from that that we should add get_bytes() and set_bytes()
> functions.  It's not obvious how you get from the former to the latter,
> and I don't think the functions you propose are well-designed in isolation.

I guess there are in fact two problems, not one.

1. Converting between bytea and integer types
2. Multibyte versions of get_byte() / set_byte()

As you rightly pointed out, for (1) we just need to add missing casts.
Here is the corresponding patch, v3-0001. Note that I couldn't re-use
int{2,4,8}recv because its first argument is StringInfo, so I ended up
implementing my own bytea->int{2,4,8} functions.

I think there may be value in (2) as well. It's implemented in v3-0002
and I did my best to clarify the commit message. On the flip side the
situation when one wants something like extracting int4 from a
bytea(or vice versa) and is not happy with convenience and/or
performance of substr()+casts is arguably rare. I'll be fine with
whatever consensus the community reaches about this patch.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev