Re: Postgres and --config-file option
Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Date: 2024-05-16T08:57:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v1-0001-Clarify-error-message-about-specifying-config-fil.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v1-0001
Hi, > Agreed that mentioning the --name variant is useful. I'm not really > on board with having one option refer to the other on the pages where > both are described, like on --help or the doc page for "postgres". > > For now, I've applied a patch for the libpq.sgml and config.sgml bits > which are improvements of their own. Thanks, Michael. I propose my original v1 patch for correcting the --help output of 'postgres' too. I agree with the above comments that corresponding changes in v4 became somewhat unwieldy. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
Commits
-
doc: Mention more variant --name=value of -c name=value for postgres
- f01e3ba56fd1 17.0 landed