Re: WIP patch for hint bit i/o mitigation
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
To: Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>, Hari Babu <haribabu.kommi@huawei.com>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-01-18T15:36:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello all, > > Sorry for the delay in updating the hackers list with the current status. > > I recently did some profiling using perf on PostgreSQL 9.2 with and without our patch. > > I noticed that maximum time is being spent on heapgettup function. Further investigation and a bit of a hunch leads me to believe that we may be adversely affecting the visibility map optimisation that directly interact with the visibility functions, that our patch straight away affects. > > If this is the case, we may really need to get down to the design of our patch, and maybe see which visibility function/functions we are affecting, and see if we can mitigate the affect. > > Please let me know your inputs on this. Any scenario that involves non-trivial amount of investigation or development should result in us pulling the patch for rework and resubmission in later 'fest....it's closing time as they say :-). merlin