Re: row filtering for logical replication
Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:49 PM tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, November 25, 2021 11:22 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks for all the review comments so far! We are endeavouring to keep > > pace with them. > > > > All feedback is being tracked and we will fix and/or reply to everything ASAP. > > > > Meanwhile, PSA the latest set of v42* patches. > > > > This version was mostly a patch restructuring exercise but it also > > addresses some minor review comments in passing. > > > > Thanks for your patch. > I have two comments on the document in 0001 patch. > > 1. > + New row is used and it contains all columns. A <literal>NULL</literal> value > + causes the expression to evaluate to false; avoid using columns without > > I don't quite understand this sentence 'A NULL value causes the expression to evaluate to false'. > The expression contains NULL value can also return true. Could you be more specific? > > For example: > > postgres=# select null or true; > ?column? > ---------- > t > (1 row) > Updated publication docs in v44 [1]. > > 2. > + at all then all other filters become redundant. If the subscriber is a > + <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> version before 15 then any row filtering > + is ignored. > > If the subscriber is a PostgreSQL version before 15, it seems row filtering will > be ignored only when copying initial data, the later changes will not be ignored in row > filtering. Should we make it clear in document? Updated subscription docs in v44 [1]. ------ [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPtjxzedJPbSZyb9pd72%2BUrGEj6HagQQbCdO0YJvr7OyJg%40mail.gmail.com Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia