Re: src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix
Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-02-04T21:12:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 5:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:58 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > OK. Now using your suggested 2nd sentence: > > > > +# The subscription's running status and failover option should be preserved > > +# in the upgraded instance. So regress_sub1 should still have > > subenabled,subfailover > > +# set to true, while regress_sub2 should have both set to false. > > > > ~ > > > > I also tweaked some other nearby comments/messages which did not > > mention the 'failover' preservation. > > > > Looks mostly good to me. One minor nitpick: > * > along with retaining the replication origin's remote lsn > -# and subscription's running status. > +# and subscription's running status and failover option. > > I don't think we need to use 'and' twice in the above sentence. We > should use ',' between different properties. I can change this on > Monday and push it unless you think otherwise. > +1 ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
Commits
-
Improve the comments in 004_subscription.pl.
- a17aa50d67ba 17.0 landed