Re: doc: improve the restriction description of using indexes on REPLICA IDENTITY FULL table.
Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-07-11T08:31:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Here are my comments for v4. ====== Docs/Comments: All the docs and updated comments LTGM, except I felt one sentence might be written differently to avoid nested parentheses. BEFORE ...used for REPLICA IDENTITY FULL table (see FindUsableIndexForReplicaIdentityFull() for details). AFTER ...used for REPLICA IDENTITY FULL table. See FindUsableIndexForReplicaIdentityFull() for details. ==== Logic: What was the decision about the earlier question [1] of removing/merging the function IsIndexOnlyOnExpression()? ------ [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPuGhGHp9Uq8-Wk7uBiirAHF5quDY_1Z6WDoUKRZqkn%2Brg%40mail.gmail.com Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
Commits
-
Remove unnecessary checks for indexes for REPLICA IDENTITY FULL tables.
- d0ce9d0bc7f6 17.0 landed
- 35c85c3c9b90 16.0 landed
-
Allow the use of a hash index on the subscriber during replication.
- edca3424342d 17.0 cited
-
Doc: clarify the conditions of usable indexes for REPLICA IDENTITY FULL tables.
- 4946910a875c 16.0 landed
- fd48a86c6241 17.0 landed
-
Allow the use of indexes other than PK and REPLICA IDENTITY on the subscriber.
- 89e46da5e511 16.0 cited