Thread
-
Re: DOCS - "\d mytable" also shows any publications that publish mytable
Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> — 2025-12-23T22:20:28Z
On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 7:28 PM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 23, 2025, at 05:07, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I was looking at "\d" documentation yesterday. > > > > The psql table describe (e.g. "\d mytable") will display a list of any > > "Publications:" that are publishing the specified table. Somehow, this > > ability had escaped being mentioned in the psql reference > > documentation. > > > > Here is a trivial patch to fix that omission. > > > > ====== > > Kind Regards, > > Peter Smith. > > Fujitsu Australia > > <v1-0001-DOCS-psql-describe-table-can-list-publications.patch> > > Not only publication, “\d table_name” also shows partition information: > > ``` > evantest=# \d t_part; > Partitioned table "public.t_part" > Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default > --------+---------+-----------+----------+--------- > id | integer | | | > val | integer | | | > Partition key: RANGE (id) > Publications: > "mypub" > Number of partitions: 3 (Use \d+ to list them.) > > evantest=# \d t_part_p1; > Table "public.t_part_p1" > Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default > --------+---------+-----------+----------+--------- > id | integer | | | > val | integer | | | > Partition of: t_part FOR VALUES FROM (0) TO (100) > ``` > > As you updating this section, you may add “partition info” as well. > OK, I've added some text about partitions. See patch v2. ~~~ TBH, the \d and \d+ partition output looked strange to me. test_pub=# \d+ tp Partitioned table "public.tp" Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default | Storage | Compression | Stats target | Description --------+---------+-----------+----------+---------+---------+-------------+--------------+------------- a | integer | | | | plain | | | Partition key: RANGE (a) Publications: "pub1" "pub3" Partitions: tp1 FOR VALUES FROM (1) TO (10), tp2 FOR VALUES FROM (10) TO (20) For example: a) Why isn't the "Partition key:" and "Partitions:" info kept together? b) Why does the "Partitions:" list indentation look different? Anyway, those are questions for another thread and another year. ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia