Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: Add documentation for sequence synchronization.
- 55cefadde874 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unused assignment in CREATE PUBLICATION grammar.
- bfb7419b0bbe 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add seq_sync_error_count to subscription statistics.
- f6a4c498dcf6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix few issues in commit 5509055d69.
- 5a4eba558aa7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add sequence synchronization for logical replication.
- 5509055d6956 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add worker type argument to logical replication worker functions.
- 3e8e05596a02 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce "REFRESH SEQUENCES" for subscriptions.
- f0b3573c3aac 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor logical worker synchronization code into a separate file.
- 41c674d2e31e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Standardize use of REFRESH PUBLICATION in code and messages.
- 2436b8c047ff 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add "ALL SEQUENCES" support to publications.
- 96b378497346 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Expose sequence page LSN via pg_get_sequence_data.
- b93172ca59f4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Resume conflict-relevant data retention automatically.
- 0d48d393d465 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Post-commit review fixes for 228c370868.
- 1f7e9ba3ac4e 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Generate GUC tables from .dat file
- 63599896545c 19 (unreleased) cited
Attachments
- PS_NITPICKS_202400809_seq_0004.txt (text/plain)
Hi Vignesh, here are my review comments for the sequences docs patch v20240808-0004. ====== doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml The new section content looked good. Just some nitpicks including: - renamed the section "Replicating Sequences" - added missing mention about how to publish sequences - rearranged the subscription commands into a more readable list - some sect2 titles were very long; I shortened them. - added <warning> markup for the sequence definition advice - other minor rewording and typo fixes ~ 1. IMO the "Caveats" section can be removed. - the advice to avoid changing the sequence definition is already given earlier in the "Sequence Definition Mismatches" section - the limitation of "incremental synchronization" is already stated in the logical replication "Limitations" section - (FYI, I removed it already in my nitpicks attachment) ====== doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_subscription.sgml nitpick - I reversed the paragraphs to keep the references in a natural order. ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 1:52 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 at 08:30, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Vignesh, Here are my v20240807-0003 review comments. > > > > 2a. > > The paragraph starts by saying "Sequence data is not replicated.". It > > seems wrong now. Doesn't that need rewording or removing? > > Changed it to incremental sequence changes. > > > ~ > > > > 2b. > > Should the info "If, however, some kind of switchover or failover..." > > be mentioned in the "Logical Replication Failover" section [2], > > instead of here? > > I think mentioning this here is appropriate. The other section focuses > more on how logical replication can proceed with a new primary. Once > the logical replication setup is complete, sequences can be refreshed > at any time. > > Rest of the comments are fixed, the attached v20240808 version patch > has the changes for the same. > > Regards, > Vignesh