Re: pg_replication_origin_drop API potential race condition
Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-02-05T04:16:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v2-0001-replorigin_drop_by_name.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v2-0001
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:20 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:31 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > PSA a patch which I think implements what we are talking about. > > > > This doesn't seem correct to me. Have you tested that the patch > resolves the problem reported originally? Because the lockmode > (RowExclusiveLock) you have used in the patch will allow multiple > callers to acquire at the same time. The other thing I don't like > about this is that first, it acquires lock in the function > replorigin_drop_by_name and then again we acquire the same lock in a > different mode in replorigin_drop. > > What I was imagining was to have a code same as replorigin_drop with > the first parameter as the name instead of id and additionally, it > will check the existence of origin by replorigin_by_name after > acquiring the lock. So you can move all the common code from > replorigin_drop (starting from restart till end leaving table_close) > to a separate function say replorigin_drop_guts and then call it from > both replorigin_drop and replorigin_drop_by_name. > > Now, I have also thought to directly change replorigin_drop but this > is an exposed API so let's keep it as it is because some extensions > might be using it. We can anyway later drop it if required. > PSA patch updated per above suggestions. ---- Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
Commits
-
Make pg_replication_origin_drop safe against concurrent drops.
- cd142e032ebd 14.0 landed