Re: row filtering for logical replication
Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
Attachments
- v1-0001-Fix-BF-test-fail-caused-by-bad-timing.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v1-0001
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 1:33 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 7:57 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I noticed that there was a build-farm failure on the machine 'komodoensis' [1] > > > > # Failed test 'check replicated rows to tab_rowfilter_toast' > > # at t/028_row_filter.pl line 687. > > # got: '' > > # expected: 't|1' > > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 20. > > [18:21:24] t/028_row_filter.pl ................ > > Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) > > Failed 1/20 subtests > > > > That failure looks intermittent because from the history you can see > > the same machine already passed multiple times in this test case. > > > > When I investigated the test case I noticed there seems to be a > > missing "catchup" ($node_publisher->wait_for_catchup($appname);), so > > sometimes if the replication happens too slowly then the expected row > > might not be found on the subscriber side. > > > > Your analysis seems correct to me and it is evident from the result as > well. Reviewing the test, it seems other similar places already have > the catchup but it is missed after this update test. > > > I will post a patch to fix this shortly. > > > > Thanks. > PSA a patch to fix the observed [1] build-farm failure. ------ [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPv%3De9Qd1TSYo8Og6x6Abfz3b9_htwinLp4ENPgV45DACQ%40mail.gmail.com Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia