Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup

Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, "shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com>, "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, "kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-08-09T02:50:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 6:52 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 1:50 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> >
> > This patch added the following error message:
> >
> > errdetail_plural("Subscribed publication %s is subscribing to other
> > publications.",
> > "Subscribed publications %s are subscribing to other publications.",
> > list_length(publist), pubnames->data),
> >
> > But in PostgreSQL, a publication cannot subscribe to a publication, so
> > this is not giving accurate information.  Apparently, what it is trying
> > to say is that
> >
> > The subscription that you are creating subscribes to publications that
> > contain tables that are written to by other subscriptions.
> >
> > Can we get to a more accurate wording like this?
> >
>
> +1 for changing the message as per your suggestion.
>

PSA a patch to change this message text. The message now has wording
similar to the suggestion.

> > There is also a translatability issue there, in the way the publication
> > list is pasted into the message.
> >

The name/list substitution is now done within parentheses, which AFAIK
will be enough to eliminate any translation ambiguities.

> > Is the list of affected publications really that interesting?  I wonder
> > whether the list of affected tables might be more relevant?
> >
>
> In that case, we need to specify both schema name and table name in
> that case. I guess the list could be very long and not sure what to do
> for schema publications ( Create Publication ... For Schema).

Right, IIUC that was the reason for not choosing to show the tables in
the original patch -- i.e. the list might easily be very long with
100s or 1000s of tables it, and so inappropriate to substitute in the
message. OTOH, showing only problematic publications is a short list
but it is still more useful than showing nothing (e.g. there other
publications of the subscription might be OK so those ones are not
listed)

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Commits

  1. Improved CREATE SUBSCRIPTION message for clarity

  2. Fix the test case introduced by commit 8756930190.

  3. Raise a warning if there is a possibility of data from multiple origins.

  4. Add wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests.

  5. Bump catversion for commit d8cd0c6c95c0120168df93aae095df4e0682a08a.

  6. Allow users to skip logical replication of data having origin.

  7. Improve two comments related to a boolean DefElem's value

  8. doc: Fix man page whitespace issues