Horton

Re: DOCS - inactive_since field readability

Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-02-16T20:35:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 4:06 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
...
>
> No, I meant to say that the description didn't looked any better to me
> even after your 0001 patch. The second paragraph started immediately
> in the next line which doesn't make it look any better. If we really
> want to make it look better then one more additional line is required.
> However, I don't want to go in that direction unless we have some
> history of writing the docs similarly. I suggest let's go with your
> 0002 patch as that makes the description concise and clear.
>

OK. My blank lines patch has been abandoned. Here is just the
'inactive_since' description patch (now called 0001).

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Commits

  1. Doc: Improve pg_replication_slots.inactive_since description.