Thread
-
Re: Support EXCEPT for ALL SEQUENCES publications
Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> — 2026-05-25T07:37:58Z
Hi Shlok - Here are some minor review comments for patch v5-0002. ====== doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml 1. <para> - True if the table is excluded from the publication. See - <link linkend="sql-createpublication-params-for-except-table"><literal>EXCEPT</literal></link>. + True if the table or the sequence is excluded from the publication. See + <link linkend="sql-createpublication-params-for-except"><literal>EXCEPT</literal></link>. /or the sequence/or sequence/ ====== src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c check_publication_add_relation: 2. * Check if relation can be in given publication and throws appropriate * error if not. ~ Too terse. There are missing words. SUGGESTION Check if the target relation is allowed to be specified in the given publication and throw an error if not. ~~~ 3. if (pri->except) { relname = RelationGetQualifiedRelationName(targetrel); if (pubrelkind == RELKIND_SEQUENCE) errormsg = gettext_noop("cannot specify \"%s\" in the publication EXCEPT (SEQUENCE) clause"); else errormsg = gettext_noop("cannot specify \"%s\" in the publication EXCEPT (TABLE) clause"); } else { relname = RelationGetRelationName(targetrel); errormsg = gettext_noop("cannot add relation \"%s\" to publication"); } ~ Wondering why sometimes the error `relname` is fully-qualified and sometimes it is not. Isn't it better to always be qualified? ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia