Re: row filtering for logical replication
Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 10:13 AM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021, at 4:18 AM, Peter Smith wrote: > > PSA a new v44* patch set. > ... > I used the last patch series (v44) posted by Peter Smith [1]. I did a lot of > improvements in this new version (v45). I merged 0001 (it is basically the main > patch I wrote) and 0004 (autocomplete). As I explained in [2], I implemented a > patch (that is incorporated in the v45-0001) to fix this issue. I saw that > Peter already proposed a slightly different patch (0006). I read this patch and > concludes that it would be better to keep the version I have. It fixes a few > things and also includes more comments. > [1] https://postgr.es/m/CAHut%2BPtJnnM8MYQDf7xCyFAp13U_0Ya2dv-UQeFD%3DghixFLZiw%40mail.gmail.com > [2] https://postgr.es/m/ca8d270d-f930-4d15-9f24-60f95b364173%40www.fastmail.com >> As I explained in [2], I implemented a patch (that is incorporated in the v45-0001) to fix this issue. I saw that Peter already proposed a slightly different patch (0006). I read this patch and concludes that it would be better to keep the version I have. It fixes a few things and also includes more comments. Your ExprState exprstate array code is essentially exactly the same logic that was int patch v44-0006 isn't it? The main difference I saw was 1. I pass the cache index (e.g. IDX_PUBACTION_DELETE etc) to the pgoutput_filter, but 2. You are passing in the ReorderBufferChangeType value. IMO the ability to directly access the cache array is more efficient. The function is called for every row operation (e.g. consider x 1 million rows) so I felt the overhead to have unnecessary if/else should be avoided. e.g. ------ if (action == REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INSERT) result = pgoutput_row_filter_exec_expr(entry->exprstate[0], ecxt); else if (action == REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_UPDATE) result = pgoutput_row_filter_exec_expr(entry->exprstate[1], ecxt); else if (action == REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_DELETE) result = pgoutput_row_filter_exec_expr(entry->exprstate[2], ecxt); else Assert(false); ------ Why not just use a direct index like was in patch v44-0006 in the first place? e.g. ------ result = pgoutput_row_filter_exec_expr(entry->exprstate[idx_pubaction], ecxt); ------ Conveniently, those ReorderBufferChangeType first 3 enums are the ones you want so you can still pass them if you want. REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INSERT, REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_UPDATE, REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_DELETE, Just use them to directly index into entry->exprstate[action] and so remove the excessive if/else. What do you think? ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia