Re: row filtering for logical replication

Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
To: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com>, "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, "tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci@gmail.com>, japin <japinli@hotmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-12-06T10:32:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Release cache tuple when no longer needed

  2. Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.

  3. Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.

  4. Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.

  5. Move scanint8() to numutils.c

  6. Replace Test::More plans with done_testing

  7. Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes

  8. Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code

  9. Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.

  10. Allow publishing the tables of schema.

  11. Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.

  12. Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs

  13. Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().

  14. Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.

  15. Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods

  16. Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate

  17. Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.

  18. Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.

  19. Rename a parse node to be more general

  20. Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query

  21. SEARCH and CYCLE clauses

On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 10:13 AM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021, at 4:18 AM, Peter Smith wrote:
>
> PSA a new v44* patch set.
>
...

> I used the last patch series (v44) posted by Peter Smith [1]. I did a lot of
> improvements in this new version (v45). I merged 0001 (it is basically the main
> patch I wrote) and 0004 (autocomplete). As I explained in [2], I implemented a
> patch (that is incorporated in the v45-0001) to fix this issue. I saw that
> Peter already proposed a slightly different patch (0006). I read this patch and
> concludes that it  would be better to keep the version I have. It fixes a few
> things and also includes more comments.
> [1] https://postgr.es/m/CAHut%2BPtJnnM8MYQDf7xCyFAp13U_0Ya2dv-UQeFD%3DghixFLZiw%40mail.gmail.com
> [2] https://postgr.es/m/ca8d270d-f930-4d15-9f24-60f95b364173%40www.fastmail.com

>> As I explained in [2], I implemented a
patch (that is incorporated in the v45-0001) to fix this issue. I saw that
Peter already proposed a slightly different patch (0006). I read this patch and
concludes that it  would be better to keep the version I have. It fixes a few
things and also includes more comments.

Your ExprState exprstate array code is essentially exactly the same
logic that was int patch v44-0006 isn't it?

The main difference I saw was
1. I pass the cache index (e.g. IDX_PUBACTION_DELETE etc) to the
pgoutput_filter, but
2. You are passing in the ReorderBufferChangeType value.

IMO the ability to directly access the cache array is more efficient.

The function is called for every row operation (e.g. consider x 1
million rows) so I felt the overhead to have unnecessary if/else
should be avoided.
e.g.
------
if (action == REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INSERT)
result = pgoutput_row_filter_exec_expr(entry->exprstate[0], ecxt);
else if (action == REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_UPDATE)
result = pgoutput_row_filter_exec_expr(entry->exprstate[1], ecxt);
else if (action == REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_DELETE)
result = pgoutput_row_filter_exec_expr(entry->exprstate[2], ecxt);
else
Assert(false);
------

Why not just use a direct index like was in patch v44-0006 in the first place?
e.g.
------
result = pgoutput_row_filter_exec_expr(entry->exprstate[idx_pubaction], ecxt);
------

Conveniently, those ReorderBufferChangeType first 3 enums are the ones
you want so you can still pass them if you want.
REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INSERT,
REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_UPDATE,
REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_DELETE,

Just use them to directly index into entry->exprstate[action] and so
remove the excessive if/else.

What do you think?

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia