Re: row filtering for logical replication
Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
Thanks for all the patches!
Here are my review comments for v69-0001
~~~
1. src/backend/executor/execReplication.c CheckCmdReplicaIdentity
call to RelationBuildPublicationDesc
+ /*
+ * It is only safe to execute UPDATE/DELETE when all columns, referenced in
+ * the row filters from publications which the relation is in, are valid -
+ * i.e. when all referenced columns are part of REPLICA IDENTITY or the
+ * table does not publish UPDATES or DELETES.
+ */
+ pubdesc = RelationBuildPublicationDesc(rel);
This code is leaky because never frees the palloc-ed memory for the pubdesc.
IMO change the RelationBuildPublicationDesc to pass in the
PublicationDesc* from the call stack then can eliminate the palloc and
risk of leaks.
~~~
2. src/include/utils/relcache.h - RelationBuildPublicationDesc
+struct PublicationDesc;
+extern struct PublicationDesc *RelationBuildPublicationDesc(Relation relation);
(Same as the previous comment #1). Suggest to change the function
signature to be void and pass the PublicationDesc* from stack instead
of palloc-ing it within the function
~~~
3. src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c - RelationBuildPublicationDesc
+RelationBuildPublicationDesc(Relation relation)
{
List *puboids;
ListCell *lc;
MemoryContext oldcxt;
Oid schemaid;
- PublicationActions *pubactions = palloc0(sizeof(PublicationActions));
+ List *ancestors = NIL;
+ Oid relid = RelationGetRelid(relation);
+ AttrNumber invalid_rfcolnum = InvalidAttrNumber;
+ PublicationDesc *pubdesc = palloc0(sizeof(PublicationDesc));
+ PublicationActions *pubactions = &pubdesc->pubactions;
+
+ pubdesc->rf_valid_for_update = true;
+ pubdesc->rf_valid_for_delete = true;
IMO it wold be better to change the "sense" of those variables.
e.g.
"rf_valid_for_update" --> "rf_invalid_for_update"
"rf_valid_for_delete" --> "rf_invalid_for_delete"
That way they have the same 'sense' as the AttrNumbers so it all reads
better to me.
Also, it means no special assignment is needed because the palloc0
will set them correctly
~~~
4. src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c - RelationBuildPublicationDesc
- if (relation->rd_pubactions)
+ if (relation->rd_pubdesc)
{
- pfree(relation->rd_pubactions);
- relation->rd_pubactions = NULL;
+ pfree(relation->rd_pubdesc);
+ relation->rd_pubdesc = NULL;
}
What is the purpose of this code? Can't it all just be removed?
e.g. Can't you Assert that relation->rd_pubdesc is NULL at this point?
(if it was not-null the function would have returned immediately from the top)
~~~
5. src/include/catalog/pg_publication.h - typedef struct PublicationDesc
+typedef struct PublicationDesc
+{
+ /*
+ * true if the columns referenced in row filters which are used for UPDATE
+ * or DELETE are part of the replica identity, or the publication actions
+ * do not include UPDATE or DELETE.
+ */
+ bool rf_valid_for_update;
+ bool rf_valid_for_delete;
+
+ AttrNumber invalid_rfcol_update;
+ AttrNumber invalid_rfcol_delete;
+
+ PublicationActions pubactions;
+} PublicationDesc;
+
I did not see any point really for the pairs of booleans and AttNumbers.
AFAIK both of them shared exactly the same validation logic so I think
you can get by using fewer members here.
e.g. (here I also reversed the sense of the bool flag, as per my suggestion #3)
typedef struct PublicationDesc
{
/*
* true if the columns referenced in row filters which are used for UPDATE
* or DELETE are part of the replica identity, or the publication actions
* do not include UPDATE or DELETE.
*/
bool rf_invalid_for_upd_del;
AttrNumber invalid_rfcol_upd_del;
PublicationActions pubactions;
} PublicationDesc;
~~~
6. src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list
Missing the new typedef PublicationDesc
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia