Horton

Re: Adding a LogicalRepWorker type field

Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-08-22T23:10:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 6:24 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 3:48 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 5:34 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > PSA v9
> > >
> >
> > LGTM. I'll push this tomorrow unless there are any more comments.
> >
>
> Pushed.
>

Thanks for pushing this. The CF entry has been updated [1]

------
[1] . https://commitfest.postgresql.org/44/4472/

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Commits

  1. Simplify the logical worker type checks by using the switch on worker type.

  2. Simplify determining logical replication worker types.