Re: Unit tests and foreign key constraints

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
wrote:

> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:39:01PM -0700, Andy Chambers wrote:
> > Hey All,
> >
> > I've started trying to use foreign key constraints in my schema but it
> > seems to make it more difficult to write unit tests that touch the
> database
> > because each test now requires more setup data to satisfy the foreign key
> > constraint. (I know some say your unit tests shouldn't touch the DB but
> the
> > more full stack tests I have, the better I sleep at night :-))
> >
> > I wondered if anyone else has run into this problem and found a good
> > strategy to mitigate it. I thought I might be able to make these
> > constraints deferred during a test run since I have automatic rollback
> > after each test but even after "set constraints all deferred", I still
> got
> > a foreign key violation during my test run if the test tries to insert
> data
> > with a non-existent foreign key.
>
> Foreign keys aren't deferrable by default, you have to create them that
> way...
>

Ah that's what I was missing. Thanks!

--
Andy