Thread
Commits
-
plpgsql: make WHEN OTHERS distinct from WHEN SQLSTATE '00000'.
- 58fdca2204de 18.0 landed
-
WHEN SQLSTATE '00000' THEN equals to WHEN OTHERS THEN
David Fiedler <david.fido.fiedler@gmail.com> — 2025-03-19T14:03:34Z
Hi, I've stumbled across a code that used this condition, resulting in unexpected behavior. I think it worths a note that catching 00000 is not possible and that it results in a catch all handler. What do you think? Should I post the expected text somewhere? Thanks, David Fiedler -- *David Fiedler* *737472531* *david.fido.fiedler@gmail.com <david.fido.fiedler@gmail.com>*
-
Re: WHEN SQLSTATE '00000' THEN equals to WHEN OTHERS THEN
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2025-03-19T15:29:50Z
David Fiedler <david.fido.fiedler@gmail.com> writes: > I've stumbled across a code that used this condition, resulting in > unexpected behavior. I think it worths a note that catching 00000 is not > possible and that it results in a catch all handler. Hmph. The code thinks * OTHERS is represented as code 0 (which would map to '00000', but we * have no need to represent that as an exception condition). but it evidently didn't consider the possibility of a user writing '00000'. I'm more inclined to consider this a bug and change plpgsql to use something else internally to represent OTHERS. We could use -1, which AFAICS cannot be generated by MAKE_SQLSTATE. regards, tom lane
-
Re: WHEN SQLSTATE '00000' THEN equals to WHEN OTHERS THEN
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> — 2025-03-19T15:32:20Z
On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 15:03 +0100, David Fiedler wrote: > I've stumbled across a code that used this condition, resulting in unexpected behavior. > I think it worths a note that catching 00000 is not possible and that it results in a catch all handler. > What do you think? Should I post the expected text somewhere? The code makes no sense, but what about this: DO $$BEGIN RAISE EXCEPTION SQLSTATE '00000'; END;$$; ERROR: 00000 CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function inline_code_block line 1 at RAISE Yours, Laurenz Albe
-
Re: WHEN SQLSTATE '00000' THEN equals to WHEN OTHERS THEN
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2025-03-20T16:04:19Z
[ redirecting to -hackers ] I wrote: > David Fiedler <david.fido.fiedler@gmail.com> writes: >> I've stumbled across a code that used this condition, resulting in >> unexpected behavior. I think it worths a note that catching 00000 is not >> possible and that it results in a catch all handler. > Hmph. The code thinks > * OTHERS is represented as code 0 (which would map to '00000', but we > * have no need to represent that as an exception condition). > but it evidently didn't consider the possibility of a user writing > '00000'. I'm more inclined to consider this a bug and change plpgsql > to use something else internally to represent OTHERS. We could use > -1, which AFAICS cannot be generated by MAKE_SQLSTATE. Here's a patch for this. I'm unsure whether to change it in back branches; is it conceivable that somebody is depending on WHEN SQLSTATE '00000' mapping to WHEN OTHERS? regards, tom lane