Re: BUG #18657: Using JSON_OBJECTAGG with volatile function leads to segfault

Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>

From: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, exclusion@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-10-16T09:04:51Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Attachments

Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> 于2024年10月16日周三 16:20写道:

>
>
> Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> 于2024年10月16日周三 08:35写道:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 9:19 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 11:00:01AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
>> > > First bad commit for this anomaly is b6e1157e7.
>> >
>> > Amit, any thoughts?
>>
>> Will look into it, thanks.
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I debug this issue, and I find that:
> after  b6e1157e7,  we shouldn't walk JsonValueExpr.raw_expr in
> expression_tree_walker_impl(), which
> is called in preprocess_aggrefs().
>
> I try to above solution, no crashed again.
>
>
I attached a patch. I found a typo comment when I worked on this issue.
But I don't include a test case,  because random() result is different
every time, maybe using explain statement.
Any thoughts?


-- 
Thanks,
Tender Wang

Commits

  1. SQL/JSON: Fix some oversights in commit b6e1157e7

  2. Don't include CaseTestExpr in JsonValueExpr.formatted_expr