Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock
Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
From: tender wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
To: "Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-12-14T11:32:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> 于2023年12月14日周四 17:35写道:
>
>
> > On 14 Dec 2023, at 14:28, tender wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Now that AND is more faster, Can we replace the '%
> SLRU_MAX_BANKLOCKS' operation in SimpleLruGetBankLock() with '& 127'
>
> unsigned int GetBankno1(unsigned int pageno) {
> return pageno & 127;
> }
>
> unsigned int GetBankno2(unsigned int pageno) {
> return pageno % 128;
> }
>
> Generates with -O2
>
> GetBankno1(unsigned int):
> mov eax, edi
> and eax, 127
> ret
> GetBankno2(unsigned int):
> mov eax, edi
> and eax, 127
> ret
>
>
> Compiler is smart enough with constants.
>
Yeah, that's true.
int GetBankno(long pageno) {
unsigned short bank_mask = 128;
int bankno = (pageno & bank_mask) % 128;
return bankno;
}
enable -O2, only one instruction:
xor eax, eax
But if we all use '%', thing changs as below:
int GetBankno(long pageno) {
unsigned short bank_mask = 128;
int bankno = (pageno % bank_mask) % 128;
return bankno;
}
mov rdx, rdi
sar rdx, 63
shr rdx, 57
lea rax, [rdi+rdx]
and eax, 127
sub eax, edx
> Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
Commits
-
Fix zeroing of pg_serial page without SLRU bank lock
- be2f07310063 17.0 landed
-
Fix misspelled assertions
- 0d3a71d0c8a7 17.0 landed
-
GUC table: Add description to computed variables
- 30b8d6e4ce11 17.0 landed
-
Improve performance of subsystems on top of SLRU
- 53c2a97a9266 17.0 landed
-
Rename SLRU elements in view pg_stat_slru
- bcdfa5f2e2f2 17.0 landed
-
Use atomic access for SlruShared->latest_page_number
- d172b717c6f4 17.0 landed
-
Split use of SerialSLRULock, creating SerialControlLock
- 7b745d85b80d 17.0 landed
-
Index SLRUs by 64-bit integers rather than by 32-bit integers
- 4ed8f0913bfd 17.0 cited
-
Add a macro templatized hashtable.
- b30d3ea824c5 10.0 cited