Re: Removing unneeded self joins

Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>

From: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>, Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>, "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark.cfm@gmail.com>, Michał Kłeczek <michal@kleczek.org>, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-04-06T11:42:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Remove GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE from enable_self_join_elimination

  2. Put enable_self_join_elimination into postgresql.conf.sample

  3. Get rid of ojrelid local variable in remove_rel_from_query()

  4. Implement Self-Join Elimination

  5. Revert: Remove useless self-joins

  6. Replace lateral references to removed rels in subqueries

  7. Replace relids in lateral subquery parse tree during SJE

  8. Forbid SJE with result relation

  9. Fix misuse of RelOptInfo.unique_for_rels cache by SJE

  10. Replace the relid in some missing fields during SJE

  11. Revert 56-bit relfilenode change and follow-up commits.

  12. Stabilize timetz test across DST transitions.

  13. Speed up finding EquivalenceClasses for a given set of rels

  14. Fix mark-and-restore-skipping test case to not be a self-join.

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> 于2025年4月6日周日 19:23写道:

> > On 6 Apr 2025, at 06:02, Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I find that the postgresql.conf.sample file doesn't contain
> enable_self_join_elimination guc.
> > If this is necessary, please see the attached patch.
>
> The GUC is marked as not supposed by the in the sample file, either it
> really
> shouldn't or that needs to be removed from the GUC declaration.
>

Sorry, I didn't see the GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE flag. Thanks for the reminder.
 Please ignore the noise.


-- 
Thanks, Tender Wang