Re: Ghost data from failed FDW transactions?

>
> Any value in supplying a single insert statement a la (less back and forth
> perhaps?):
>

Yes, absolutely that would be better. This particular endpoint has some
ancient + crufty code backing it (migrated from a NoSQL DB with a
db-agnostic shim that we're slowly replacing). The old code likes doing
things client-side instead of being sane about SQL semantics.

But I don't think that would affect the issue here, right?

--
Jake Biesinger