Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
Dickson S. Guedes <listas@guedesoft.net>
From: "Dickson S. Guedes" <listas@guedesoft.net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-19T11:40:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2011/10/18 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Dickson S. Guedes <listas@guedesoft.net> wrote: >> >>> Ah ok! I started reviewing the v4 patch version, this is my comments: >> >> ... >> >>> Well, all the tests was running with the default postgresql.conf in my >>> laptop but I'll setup a more "real world" environment to test for >>> performance regression. Until now I couldn't notice any significant >>> difference in TPS before and after patch in a small environment. I'll >>> post something soon. >> >> Great testing, thanks. Likely will have no effect in non-I/O swamped >> environment, but no regression expected either. > > > Any reason or objection to committing this patch? I didn't see any performance regression (as expected) in the environments that I tested. About the code, I prefer someone with more experience to review it. Thanks. -- Dickson S. Guedes mail/xmpp: guedes@guedesoft.net - skype: guediz http://guedesoft.net - http://www.postgresql.org.br