Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-
Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>
From: Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, "imai.yoshikazu@fujitsu.com" <imai.yoshikazu@fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-11-04T15:14:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
Em seg., 4 de nov. de 2019 às 11:53, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> escreveu: > > On 2019-Oct-17, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > > > First, I'd like to clarify what I believe Tom's suggestion is, and then > > > talk through that, as his vote sways this topic pretty heavily. > > > > > Tom, I take it your suggestion is to have '-f -' be accepted to mean > > > 'goes to stdout' in all branches? > > > > Yes. > > +1 for this, FWIW. Let's get it done before next week minors. Is > anybody writing a patch? If not, I can do it. > I'm not. > > > If you meant for all branches to accept '-f -' and have it go to a './-' > > > file then that's just a revert of this entire change, which I can't > > > agree with either > > > > No, I'm not proposing a full revert. But there's certainly room to > > consider reverting the part that says you *must* write "-f -" to get > > output to stdout. > > I don't think this will buy us anything, if we get past branches updated > promptly. > +1. -- Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
Commits
-
Change pg_restore -f- to dump to stdout instead of to ./-
- 5ee8f0fe13b4 10.11 landed
- d38635725cad 9.5.20 landed
- 12a51e2ebea7 9.6.16 landed
- 9fb25fda6d56 9.4.25 landed
- 3574c0ac0509 11.6 landed