Horton
Menu

Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndquadrant.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-01-11T09:53:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 1/1/17 4:14 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> OK, so here's the patch, plus doc cleanup patch.
>
> I don't think this patch is likely to succeed if we throw in more ideas
> in every round.
>
> I think we have or are approaching agreement on moving recovery.conf
> into postgresql.conf, making the settings reloadable, and adding signal
> (formerly trigger) files to trigger recovery or standby.  I think that
> is a useful change, but it's already big enough and needs extensive
> reviewing and testing.

Agreed. It's better to focus on the "core" part of the patch firstly.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao