Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> On 2015-07-06 11:14:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> The COUNT() correctly says 11 rows, but after crash-and-recover,
>>> only the row with -1 is there. This is because the INSERT writes
>>> out an INSERT+INIT WAL record, which we happily replay, clobbering
>>> the data added later by COPY.
>
>> ISTM any WAL logged action that touches a relfilenode essentially needs
>> to disable further optimization based on the knowledge that the relation
>> is new.
>
> After a bit more thought, I think it's not so much "any WAL logged action"
> as "any unconditionally-replayed action". INSERT+INIT breaks this
> example because heap_xlog_insert will unconditionally replay the action,
> even if the page is valid and has same or newer LSN. Similarly, TRUNCATE
> is problematic because we redo it unconditionally (and in that case it's
> hard to see an alternative).
>
>> It'd not be impossible to add more state to the relcache entry for the
>> relation. Whether it's likely that we'd find all the places that'd need
>> updating that state, I'm not sure.
>
> Yeah, the sticking point is mainly being sure that the state is correctly
> tracked, both now and after future changes. We'd need to identify a state
> invariant that we could be pretty confident we'd not break.
>
> One idea I had was to allow the COPY optimization only if the heap file is
> physically zero-length at the time the COPY starts.
This seems not helpful for the case where TRUNCATE is executed
before COPY. No?
> That would still be
> able to optimize in all the cases we care about making COPY fast for.
> Rather than reverting cab9a0656c36739f, which would re-introduce a
> different performance problem, perhaps we could have COPY create a new
> relfilenode when it does this. That should be safe if the table was
> previously empty.
So, if COPY is executed multiple times at the same transaction,
only first COPY can be optimized?
After second thought, I'm thinking that we can safely optimize
COPY if no problematic WAL records like INSERT+INIT or TRUNCATE
are generated since current REDO location or the table was created
at the same transaction. That is, if INSERT or TRUNCATE is executed
after the table creation, but if CHECKPOINT happens subsequently,
we don't need to log COPY. The subsequent crash recovery will not
replay such problematic WAL records. So the example cases where
we can optimize COPY are:
BEGIN
CREATE TABLE
COPY
COPY -- subsequent COPY also can be optimized
BEGIN
CREATE TABLE
TRUNCATE
CHECKPOINT
COPY
BEGIN
CREATE TABLE
INSERT
CHECKPOINT
COPY
A crash recovery can start from previous REDO location (i.e., REDO
location of the last checkpoint record). So we might need to check
whether such problematic WAL records are generated since the previous
REDO location instead of current one.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Commits
-
Add perl2host call missing from a new test file.
- 70de4e950c3b 13.0 landed
-
Skip WAL for new relfilenodes, under wal_level=minimal.
- c6b92041d385 13.0 landed
- 9db4b9da2801 9.5.22 landed
- a653bd8aa76e 9.6.18 landed
- 9d6215205e5a 10.13 landed
- 03b89f1949a9 11.8 landed
- e4b0a02ef8c8 12.3 landed
- cb2fd7eac285 13.0 landed
-
Revert "Skip WAL for new relfilenodes, under wal_level=minimal."
- b31e96ba420f 9.5.22 landed
- 348f15e22e94 9.6.18 landed
- 0a6c9c66da26 10.13 landed
- 63631ee64f84 12.3 landed
- 2fbdebc248ec 11.8 landed
- de9396326edc 13.0 landed
-
Back-patch log_newpage_range().
- e0dd086414f7 9.5.22 landed
- 14d2bb4941e6 9.6.18 landed
- 43434ed94d80 10.13 landed
- ae86e46c3b7b 11.8 landed
-
During heap rebuild, lock any TOAST index until end of transaction.
- a8f754aea014 9.6.18 landed
- 978da2a95597 9.5.22 landed
- 78a34c68920a 10.13 landed
- 88b3a6cd2623 12.3 landed
- 4433c6e8c0a5 11.8 landed
- e629a01f6973 13.0 landed
-
In log_newpage_range(), heed forkNum and page_std arguments.
- a5abec521c5d 12.3 landed
- d3e572855be1 13.0 landed
-
Back-patch src/test/recovery and PostgresNode from 9.6 to 9.5.
- 12034da6cc39 9.5.22 landed
-
Reduce pg_ctl's reaction time when waiting for postmaster start/stop.
- c61559ec3a41 10.0 cited
-
Accelerate end-of-transaction dropping of relations
- 279628a0a7cf 9.3.0 cited
-
Redesign the planner's handling of index-descent cost estimation.
- 31f38f28b00c 9.3.0 cited
-
Make TRUNCATE do truncate-in-place when processing a relation that was created
- cab9a0656c36 9.0.0 cited