Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>

Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2012-06-26T15:06:35Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

pg_controldata_walfilename_v4.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v4

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>
>> Excerpts from Fujii Masao's message of mar mar 27 06:40:34 -0300 2012:
>>
>>> Anyway, should I add this patch into the next CF? Or is anyone planning
>>> to commit the patch for 9.2?
>>
>> I think the correct thing to do here is add to next CF, and if some
>> committer has enough interest in getting it quickly it can be grabbed
>> from there and committed into 9.2.
>
> Yep! I've added it to next CF.

Attached is the revised version of the patch.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao