Re: Updated version of pg_receivexlog
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-27T08:12:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:46, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:29, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>>>> I've applied this version with a few more minor changes that Heikki found. >>>> >>>> Cool! >>>> >>>> When I tried pg_receivexlog and checked the contents of streamed WAL file by >>>> xlogdump, I found that recent WAL records that walsender has already sent don't >>>> exist in that WAL file. I expected that pg_receivexlog writes the streamed WAL >>>> records to the disk as soon as possible, but it doesn't. Is this >>>> intentional? Or bug? >>>> Am I missing something? >>> >>> It writes it to disk as soon as possible, but doesn't fsync() until >>> the end of each segment. Are you by any chance looking at the file >>> while it's running? >> >> No. I looked at that file after shutting down the master server. > > Ugh, in that case something is certainly wrong. There is nothing but > setting up some offset values between PQgetCopyData() and write()... When end-of-copy stream is found or an error happens, pg_receivexlog exits without flushing outstanding WAL records. Which seems to cause the problem I reported. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center