Re: analyze-in-stages post upgrade questions
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: Mircea Cadariu <cadariu.mircea@gmail.com>,
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, "Zechman, Derek S" <Derek.S.Zechman@snapon.com>,
Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-08-18T02:36:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 3:14 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > I also am leaning towards treating this as v19 material. It's a nontrivial > behavior change, and this option is useful for major version upgrades, > which is an area that we really don't want to surprise users too much. +1 > Furthermore, auto-analyze doesn't process partitioned tables, either, so > this introduces a bit of divergence. (I'd love to see that project picked > up again someday. Perhaps I will take a gander...) Sounds good! Regards, -- Fujii Masao
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
vacuumdb: Make vacuumdb --analyze-only process partitioned tables.
- 6429e5b771db 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Integrate FullTransactionIds deeper into two-phase code
- 62a17a92833d 19 (unreleased) cited