Re: [PATCH] Add hints for invalid binary encoding names in encode/decode functions
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Sugamoto Shinya <shinya34892@gmail.com>,
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-17T14:59:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 11:30 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: > > > On 17 Nov 2025, at 15:08, Sugamoto Shinya <shinya34892@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I ordered the valid encodings alphabetically and extracted those into separate parameters. > > LGTM. Per project style I don't think we should quote the names of encodings > since they are visibly not English words (see commit a243569bf65c5 which deals > with variable names, but I think it applies here as well) It looks like the message-style rule added in commit a243569bf65c5 applies only to configuration parameter names, right? And it seems that rule was later revised by commit 17974ec2594. Is that correct? Regards, -- Fujii Masao
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add HINT listing valid encodings to encode() and decode() errors.
- 99780da72096 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Revise GUC names quoting in messages again
- 17974ec25946 17.0 cited
-
doc: Mention how to use quotes with GUC names in error messages
- a243569bf65c 17.0 cited
-
Adjust assorted hint messages that list all valid options.
- 5ac51c8c9e44 16.0 cited