Re: Allow GUC settings in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION to take effect
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-25T11:30:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add TAP test for GUC settings passed via CONNECTION in logical replication.
- ec8d91c7e78c 15.16 landed
- 67edd54f0639 16.12 landed
- 358784645eb8 17.8 landed
- 6ec596815125 18.2 landed
- 5f13999aa11d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Honor GUC settings specified in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION.
- f7eb44e0f087 15.16 landed
- 75f3428f2436 16.12 landed
- 7a990e801a72 17.8 landed
- 797fc5d1b38d 18.2 landed
- d926462d8190 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Ensure consistent logical replication of datetime and float8 values.
- f3d4019da5d0 15.0 cited
On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 12:52 PM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote: > V3 looks good to me. Thanks for reviewing the patch! > > Yeah, I agree that if certain GUCs can break logical replication, > > we should enforce "safe" values, just as we currently do for datestyle. > > And if any other GUCs can cause the issue, they could affect > > postgres_fdw etc, so the fix would need to be broader. > > Just want to clarify if you mean you will handle this in a future patch? I don't currently know of any other parameters that must be forced for logical replication or postgres_fdw. But if we identify any, I'm happy to review a patch that adds the necessary handling. Regards, -- Fujii Masao