Horton

Re: BUG #13770: Extending recovery_min_apply_delay on Standby causes it to be unavailable for a while

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Greg Clough <greg@gclough.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-03-05T17:47:54Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs 
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> On 2016-03-03 23:42:25 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> We should backpatch this? I'm tempted to do that
>>> because it seems an oversight.
>>> It's user-visible change of behavior, though.
>>
>> I agree we should.
>
> We definitely need to backpatch.

Yeah, we should backpatch to 9.4 where the parameter was added.
Pushed. Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao

Commits

  1. Ignore recovery_min_apply_delay until recovery has reached consistent state