Re: Allow GUC settings in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION to take effect
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Cc: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-27T05:17:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add TAP test for GUC settings passed via CONNECTION in logical replication.
- ec8d91c7e78c 15.16 landed
- 67edd54f0639 16.12 landed
- 358784645eb8 17.8 landed
- 6ec596815125 18.2 landed
- 5f13999aa11d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Honor GUC settings specified in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION.
- f7eb44e0f087 15.16 landed
- 75f3428f2436 16.12 landed
- 7a990e801a72 17.8 landed
- 797fc5d1b38d 18.2 landed
- d926462d8190 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Ensure consistent logical replication of datetime and float8 values.
- f3d4019da5d0 15.0 cited
Attachments
- v4-0001-PG15-PG16-Honor-GUC-settings-specified-in-CREATE-SUBSCRIPTI.txt (text/plain)
- v4-0001-Honor-GUC-settings-specified-in-CREATE-SUBSCRIPTI.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v4-0001
- v4-0002-Add-TAP-test-for-GUC-settings-passed-via-CONNECTI.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v4-0002
- v4-0001-PG17-Honor-GUC-settings-specified-in-CREATE-SUBSCRIPTI.txt (text/plain)
On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 11:46 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 2:37 AM Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com> wrote: > > Looking at v3 raises two questions for me. > > > > First is if we should have a doc notion of which variables ought to be > > set to what. > > Are you suggesting that we document which GUC parameters should be set, > and to what values, for logical replication? We already have a section on this > in logical-replication.sgml. Is that sufficient? > > > > Second, how do we actually test that subscription connection options > > are applied on the subscriber side? Can we have TAP for this (is is > > worth the troubles)? > > +1 on adding a test. One idea is to enable log_replication_commands via > the CONNECTION option and then check that the publisher’s log contains > the message "received replication command: IDENTIFY_SYSTEM". > There may be a cleaner way to test this, though. I've added the test and attached it as patch v4-0002. The test enables log_disconnections via the CONNECTION string and then checks that the publisher's log contains the expected disconnection message after the logical replication connection is reestablished. Regards, -- Fujii Masao