Re: bug of recovery?
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-09-27T05:00:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes: >> ISTM that writing an invalid-page table to the disk for every restartpoints is >> better approach. > > I still say that's uncalled-for overkill. The invalid-page table is not > necessary for recovery, it's only a debugging cross-check. If so, there is no risk even if the invalid-page table is lost and the check is skipped unexpectedly? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center