Horton

Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@oss.ntt.co.jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-04T12:05:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Treat 2PC commit/abort the same as regular xacts in recovery.

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, but I still don't really think it's fair to say that you've
>>> proposed a solution to this problem.  Or if you have, neither I nor
>>> Fujii Masao understand that proposal well enough to decide whether we
>>> like it.
>>
>> Arguing between trenches doesn't really get us anywhere.
>>
>> As ever, when someone claims to have a better solution then it is up
>> to them to prove that is the case.
>
> So... are you going to do that?

Simon, could you? If your proposal turns out to be better than mine, I'd be
happy to agree to drop my patch and adopt yours.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center