Re: BRIN indexes - TRAP: BadArgument
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>,
Emanuel Calvo <3manuek@esdebian.org>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>,
Nicolas Barbier <nicolas.barbier@gmail.com>,
Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>,
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>,
Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-11-09T13:30:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > I just pushed this, after some more minor tweaks. Nice! > Thanks, and please do continue testing! I got the following PANIC error in the standby server when I set up the replication servers and ran "make installcheck". Note that I was repeating the manual CHECKPOINT every second while "installcheck" was running. Without the checkpoints, I could not reproduce the problem. I'm not sure if CHECKPOINT really triggers this problem, though. Anyway BRIN seems to have a problem around its WAL replay. 2014-11-09 22:19:42 JST sby1 WARNING: page 547 of relation base/16384/30878 does not exist 2014-11-09 22:19:42 JST sby1 CONTEXT: xlog redo BRIN/UPDATE: rel 1663/16384/30878 heapBlk 6 revmapBlk 1 pagesPerRange 1 old TID (3,2) TID (547,2) 2014-11-09 22:19:42 JST sby1 PANIC: WAL contains references to invalid pages 2014-11-09 22:19:42 JST sby1 CONTEXT: xlog redo BRIN/UPDATE: rel 1663/16384/30878 heapBlk 6 revmapBlk 1 pagesPerRange 1 old TID (3,2) TID (547,2) 2014-11-09 22:19:47 JST sby1 LOG: startup process (PID 15230) was terminated by signal 6: Abort trap 2014-11-09 22:19:47 JST sby1 LOG: terminating any other active server processes Regards, -- Fujii Masao
Commits
-
Refactor per-page logic common to all redo routines to a new function.
- f8f4227976a2 9.5.0 cited
-
Reduce use of heavyweight locking inside hash AM.
- 76837c1507cb 9.3.0 cited
-
Scan the buffer pool just once, not once per fork, during relation drop.
- ece01aae4792 9.2.0 cited
-
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov>
- 9e2a87b62db8 7.1.1 cited