Re: [PATCH] Speedup truncates of relation forks
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: "Jamison, Kirk" <k.jamison@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Adrien Nayrat <adrien.nayrat@anayrat.info>
Date: 2019-09-13T13:05:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Speedup truncations of relation forks.
- 6d05086c0a79 13.0 landed
-
Remove unused smgrdounlinkfork() function.
- 33a94bae605e 13.0 landed
-
Accelerate end-of-transaction dropping of relations
- 279628a0a7cf 9.3.0 cited
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:51 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 2019-Sep-13, Fujii Masao wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:52 PM Jamison, Kirk <k.jamison@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > > Please add a preliminary patch that removes the function. Dead code is good, > > > > as long as it is gone. We can get it pushed ahead of the rest of this. > > > > > > Alright. I've attached a separate patch removing the smgrdounlinkfork. > > > > Per the past discussion, some people want to keep this "dead" function > > for some reasons. So, in my opinion, it's better to just enclose the function > > with #if NOT_USED and #endif, to keep the function itself as it is, and then > > to start new discussion on hackers about the removal of that separatedly > > from this patch. > > I searched for anybody requesting to keep the function. I couldn't find > anything. Tom said in 2012: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1471.1339106082@sss.pgh.pa.us Yes. And I found Andres. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180621174129.hogefyopje4xaznu@alap3.anarazel.de > > As committed, the smgrdounlinkfork case is actually dead code; it's > > never called from anywhere. I left it in place just in case we want > > it someday. > > but if no use has appeared in 7 years, I say it's time to kill it. +1 Regards, -- Fujii Masao