Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: "Dickson S. Guedes" <listas@guedesoft.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-19T10:36:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Any reason or objection to committing this patch? The checkpointer doesn't call pgstat_send_bgwriter(), but it should. Otherwise, some entries in pg_stat_bgwriter will never be updated. If we adopt the patch, checkpoint is performed by checkpointer. So it looks odd that information related to checkpoint exist in pg_stat_bgwriter. We should move them to new catalog even if it breaks the compatibility? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center