Re: [PATCH] Add hints for invalid binary encoding names in encode/decode functions
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>,
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Sugamoto Shinya <shinya34892@gmail.com>, Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-18T04:07:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 5:34 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 8:44 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 04:04:17PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > > Oh right, I had forgotten about that, thanks for the reminder. The patch as > > > proposed is correct then. > > > > The patch is probably fine as-is, but this seems like a candidate for the > > ClosestMatch stuff added by commit 5ac51c8. > > +1 Is there a guideline on when we should use the ClosestMatch machinery instead of explicitly listing valid values? From the discussion in [1], it seems appropriate when there are many possible values. But should we generally replace all hints that list valid values with ClosestMatch, or only in specific cases? Regards, [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/b1f9f399-3a1a-b554-283f-4ae7f34608e2@enterprisedb.com -- Fujii Masao
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add HINT listing valid encodings to encode() and decode() errors.
- 99780da72096 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Revise GUC names quoting in messages again
- 17974ec25946 17.0 cited
-
doc: Mention how to use quotes with GUC names in error messages
- a243569bf65c 17.0 cited
-
Adjust assorted hint messages that list all valid options.
- 5ac51c8c9e44 16.0 cited