Re: [PATCH] Add hints for invalid binary encoding names in encode/decode functions

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Sugamoto Shinya <shinya34892@gmail.com>, Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-18T04:07:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 5:34 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 8:44 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 04:04:17PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > > Oh right, I had forgotten about that, thanks for the reminder.  The patch as
> > > proposed is correct then.
> >
> > The patch is probably fine as-is, but this seems like a candidate for the
> > ClosestMatch stuff added by commit 5ac51c8.
>
> +1

Is there a guideline on when we should use the ClosestMatch machinery
instead of explicitly listing valid values? From the discussion in [1],
it seems appropriate when there are many possible values.
But should we generally replace all hints that list valid values
with ClosestMatch, or only in specific cases?

Regards,

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/b1f9f399-3a1a-b554-283f-4ae7f34608e2@enterprisedb.com

-- 
Fujii Masao



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add HINT listing valid encodings to encode() and decode() errors.

  2. Revise GUC names quoting in messages again

  3. doc: Mention how to use quotes with GUC names in error messages

  4. Adjust assorted hint messages that list all valid options.