Thread

Commits

  1. Fix documentation of pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup functions.

  1. Minor correction in the doc for non-exclusive pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup

    Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> — 2019-04-18T15:38:23Z

    Hi,
    
    >     These functions cannot be executed during recovery (except
    >     <function>pg_is_in_backup</function>, <function>pg_backup_start_time</function>
    >     and <function>pg_wal_lsn_diff</function>).
    
    Regarding backup control functions, the func.sgml describes as above.
    But non-exclusive pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup can also be
    executed during recovery, and which should be described in the doc.
    So I think that the attached patch should be pushed. Thought?
    
    Probably the patch needs to be back-patched to 9.6 where non-exclusive
    backup API was added.
    
    Regards,
    
    -- 
    Fujii Masao
    
  2. Re: Minor correction in the doc for non-exclusive pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup

    Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2019-04-19T02:36:54Z

    On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:38:23AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
    > Regarding backup control functions, the func.sgml describes as above.
    > But non-exclusive pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup can also be
    > executed during recovery, and which should be described in the doc.
    > So I think that the attached patch should be pushed. Thought?
    > 
    > Probably the patch needs to be back-patched to 9.6 where non-exclusive
    > backup API was added.
    
    +1.
    --
    Michael
    
  3. Re: Minor correction in the doc for non-exclusive pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup

    Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> — 2019-04-22T17:46:27Z

    On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:36 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
    >
    > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:38:23AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
    > > Regarding backup control functions, the func.sgml describes as above.
    > > But non-exclusive pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup can also be
    > > executed during recovery, and which should be described in the doc.
    > > So I think that the attached patch should be pushed. Thought?
    > >
    > > Probably the patch needs to be back-patched to 9.6 where non-exclusive
    > > backup API was added.
    >
    > +1.
    
    Thanks! Committed.
    
    Regards,
    
    
    -- 
    Fujii Masao