Re: Make wal_receiver_timeout configurable per subscription
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2026-02-06T04:32:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 10:50 AM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote: > If we stored it as an integer, an input such as '1min' would be normalized to > 60000 (milliseconds) and lose its unit. > > That would make it inconsistent with the original user input shown in pg_subscription. > So we keep it as a string, right? Yes, I think. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add per-subscription wal_receiver_timeout setting.
- fb80f388f4a1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Make GUC wal_receiver_timeout user-settable.
- 8a6af3ad0879 19 (unreleased) landed