Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2013-03-18T18:03:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > Please find attached the patches wanted: > - 20130317_dump_only_valid_index.patch, a 1-line patch that makes pg_dump > not take a dump of invalid indexes. This patch can be backpatched to 9.0. Don't indisready and indislive need to be checked? The patch seems to change pg_dump so that it ignores an invalid index only when the remote server version >= 9.0. But why not when the remote server version < 9.0? I think that you should start new thread to get much attention about this patch if there is no enough feedback. > Note that there have been some recent discussions about that. This *problem* > also concerned pg_upgrade. > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20121207141236.GB4699@alvh.no-ip.org What's the conclusion of this discussion? pg_dump --binary-upgrade also should ignore an invalid index? pg_upgrade needs to be changed together? Regards, -- Fujii Masao
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Background worker processes
- da07a1e85651 9.3.0 cited
-
Fix assorted bugs in CREATE/DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
- 3c84046490be 9.3.0 cited
-
Work around unportable behavior of malloc(0) and realloc(NULL, 0).
- 09ac603c36d1 9.3.0 cited
-
Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries.
- beb850e1d873 9.3.0 cited