Horton

Re: POC: converting Lists into arrays

Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-16T16:07:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:01 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I cast my vote in the other direction i.e. for sticking with qsort.

I do too.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan

Commits

  1. Remove EState.es_range_table_array.

  2. Rationalize use of list_concat + list_copy combinations.

  3. Cosmetic improvements in setup of planner's per-RTE arrays.

  4. Make better use of the new List implementation in a couple of places

  5. Fix sepgsql test results for commit d97b714a2.

  6. Avoid using lcons and list_delete_first where it's easy to do so.

  7. Remove lappend_cell...() family of List functions.

  8. Clean up some ad-hoc code for sorting and de-duplicating Lists.

  9. Redesign the API for list sorting (list_qsort becomes list_sort).

  10. Remove dead code.

  11. Represent Lists as expansible arrays, not chains of cons-cells.

  12. Standardize some more loops that chase down parallel lists.

  13. Reimplement the linked list data structure used throughout the backend.