Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-10-05T03:28:46Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 8:19 PM Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > I am changing pg_amcheck to filter out indexes as you say. Since the btree check should no longer error in these cases, the issue of pg_amcheck exit(2) sorts itself out without further code changes. Cool. > I am changing verify_heapam to skip unlogged tables during recovery. In testing, checking such a table results in a simple notice: > > NOTICE: cannot verify unlogged relation "u_tbl" during recovery, skipping That makes sense to me. > While testing, I also created an index on the unlogged table and checked that index using bt_index_parent_check, and was surprised that checking it using bt_index_parent_check raises an error: > > ERROR: cannot acquire lock mode ShareLock on database objects while recovery is in progress > HINT: Only RowExclusiveLock or less can be acquired on database objects during recovery. Calling bt_index_parent_check() in hot standby mode is kind of asking for it to error-out. It requires a ShareLock on the relation, which is inherently not possible during recovery. So I don't feel too badly about letting it just happen. > So I am changing pg_amcheck to filter out indexes when pg_is_in_recovery() is true and relpersistence='u'. Does that sound right to you? Yes, that all sounds right to me. Thanks -- Peter Geoghegan
Commits
-
Remove unstable pg_amcheck tests.
- cd3f429d9565 15.0 landed
- 5863115e4cb1 14.1 landed
-
pg_amcheck: avoid unhelpful verification attempts.
- d2bf06db3779 15.0 landed
- dd58194cf563 14.1 landed
-
amcheck: Skip unlogged relations in Hot Standby.
- 292698f158dd 15.0 landed
- e7712155ea08 14.1 landed
-
amcheck: Skip unlogged relations during recovery.
- 6754fe65a4c6 13.0 cited