Horton

Re: ECPG installcheck tests fail if PGDATABASE is set

Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-09-27T21:32:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:28 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Don't think I like ecpg's tests behaving differently in this respect
> than the rest of them do; that seems like a recipe for unrecognized
> security issues.
>
> If nobody can think of a positive reason for pg_regress not to
> unset PGDATABASE unconditionally, let's try that and see how it
> goes.

It would be nice to get this fixed. Several people have been confused
by it at this point.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan

Commits

  1. Make pg_regress.c unset PGDATABASE during make installcheck.