Horton

Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?

Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-02-27T22:45:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 2:44 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> If this is the problem (although I think we'd find that OID collisions
> are rather rare compared to other gratuitous cfbot failures), why not
> have the cfbot build with a flag that ignores OID collisions?

How would that work?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

Commits

  1. Remove remaining hard-wired OID references in the initial catalog data.

  2. Create a script that can renumber manually-assigned OIDs.

  3. Minor improvements for reformat_dat_file.pl.