Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug

Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>

To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, "Jameson, Hunter 'James'" <hunjmes@amazon.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>, Rahila Syed <rahila.syed@2ndquadrant.com>

Date: 2020-09-14T17:55:56Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:37 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am planning to push this tomorrow after doing testing on
> back-branches. Let me know if you have any comments.

The fix seems sensible to me.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

Commits

Update parallel BTree scan state when the scan keys can't be satisfied.
- b7f2dd959a50 14.0 landed
- fcc3665a03a6 10.15 landed
- 956891faba7d 11.10 landed
- 4bc63462d9d8 12.5 landed
- 0abd9cd2f3a1 13.0 landed
btree: Support parallel index scans.
- 569174f1be92 10.0 cited