Re: AW: AW: BUG #18147: ERROR: invalid perminfoindex 0 in RTE with relid xxxxx
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Hans Buschmann <buschmann@nidsa.net>,
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, "pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-10-23T19:01:37Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Prevent duplicate RTEPermissionInfo for plain-inheritance parents
- 01575ad788e3 17.0 landed
- 178ee1d858d8 16.1 landed
-
Fix problems when a plain-inheritance parent table is excluded.
- b1444a09dcb5 16.1 landed
- 8f4a6b9e4f5b 14.10 landed
- 1268e7378123 15.5 landed
- 387f9ed0a083 17.0 landed
-
Doc: indexUnchanged is strictly a hint.
- 74e5ea1e002f 17.0 landed
- cf89d3052d62 16.1 landed
- be2502947f29 15.5 landed
- df73ca35144a 14.10 landed
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:55 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Yeah, there are comments within index_unchanged_by_update about those > things. What I'm unhappy about is that indexam.sgml's discussion of > the indexUnchanged flag makes it sound far more trustworthy than it > actually is. Somebody who just read that doco and didn't scour the > underlying code would be badly misled. I understand. I'll come up with a doc patch for that later on today. -- Peter Geoghegan